Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macioch, J. E
Right arrow Articles by Feinstein, S. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macioch, J. E
Right arrow Articles by Feinstein, S. B
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effect of contrast enhancement on measurement of carotid artery intimal medial thickness

James E Macioch

Section of Cardiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke’s Medical Center, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA

C Dean Katsamakis

Section of Cardiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke’s Medical Center, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA

Jason Robin

Section of Cardiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke’s Medical Center, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA

Philip R Liebson

Section of Cardiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke’s Medical Center, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA

Peter M Meyer

Section of Cardiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke’s Medical Center, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA

Chris Geohas

Section of Cardiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke’s Medical Center, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA

Joel S Raichlen

Section of Cardiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke’s Medical Center, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA

Michael H Davidson

Section of Cardiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke’s Medical Center, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA

Steven B Feinstein

Section of Cardiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke’s Medical Center, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA, steven_feinstein{at}rush.edu

Previous studies have used standard B-mode ultrasound to quantify the aggregate mean intimal medial thickness (IMT) of the near and far wall of the common carotid artery (CCA). Many investigators have had difficulty in accurately evaluating the near wall IMT secondary to difficulty in discerning the vessel lumen and intima. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of contrast enhanced ultrasound on IMT measurement when compared with non-enhanced images. Twenty-six patients who had standard carotid ultrasounds completed over a 6-month period were evaluated, with 24 imaged by the same sonographer. Five to six measurements of the near and far walls were obtained over a 1 cm distance, beginning and ending 0.5 cm and 1.5 cm proximal to the carotid bifurcation. The measurements were made with and without the contrast agent OptisonTM (perflutren protein type-A microspheres), which was given as an IV bolus (0.5-0.7 cc). Of those imaged by the same sonographer, 40 carotid arteries were examined and a total of 867 measurements were obtained. A total of 10% of the carotid ultrasounds were restudied approximately 1 month after the initial interpretation to assess observer accuracy. The near wall CCA mean (SD) IMT was 0.075 (0.019)cm for left with contrast versus 0.067 (0.023)cm for left without contrast and 0.089 (0.024)cm for right with versus 0.071 (0.022)cm for right without, p 0.0001 both sides. For the far wall of the CCA, the mean (SD) IMT comparison was 0.075 (0.021)cm for left with versus 0.070 (0.016)cm for left without, p = 0.005, and 0.070 (0.023)cm for right with versus 0.070 (0.016) cm for right without, p = 0.68. In conclusion, contrast-enhanced IMT measurement showed a highly statistically significant difference in near carotid wall thickness determinations versus non-contrast values. The thicker measurement is in agreement with previously reported data showing that non-contrast images underestimated near wall common carotid IMT in histologic samples.

Key Words: cardiovascular imaging techniques • Doppler ultrasound • peripheral vascular disease

Vascular Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 1, 7-12 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/1358863x04vm522oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Xiong, Y.-B. Deng, Y. Zhu, Y.-N. Liu, and X.-J. Bi
Correlation of Carotid Plaque Neovascularization Detected by Using Contrast-enhanced US with Clinical Symptoms
Radiology, May 1, 2009; 251(2): 583 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
M. Magnoni, S. Coli, M. M. Marrocco-Trischitta, G. Melisurgo, D. De Dominicis, D. Cianflone, R. Chiesa, S. B. Feinstein, and A. Maseri
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of periadventitial vasa vasorum in human carotid arteries
Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2009; 10(2): 260 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Coli, M. Magnoni, G. Sangiorgi, M. M. Marrocco-Trischitta, G. Melisurgo, A. Mauriello, L. Spagnoli, R. Chiesa, D. Cianflone, and A. Maseri
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization in carotid arteries correlation with histology and plaque echogenicity.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 15, 2008; 52(3): 223 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
F. Shah, P. Balan, M. Weinberg, V. Reddy, R. Neems, M. Feinstein, J. Dainauskas, P. Meyer, M. Goldin, and S. B. Feinstein
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization: a new surrogate marker of atherosclerosis?
Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2007; 12(4): 291 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
I. J. Kullo and A. R. Malik
Arterial Ultrasonography and Tonometry as Adjuncts to Cardiovascular Risk Stratification
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2007; 49(13): 1413 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
M. J Roman, T. Z Naqvi, J. M Gardin, M. Gerhard-Herman, M. Jaff, and E. Mohler
American Society of Echocardiography Report: Clinical application of noninvasive vascular ultrasound in cardiovascular risk stratification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology
Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2006; 11(3): 201 - 211.
[PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. B. Feinstein
Contrast Ultrasound Imaging of the Carotid Artery Vasa Vasorum and Atherosclerotic Plaque Neovascularization
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 236 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]