Vascular Medicine

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deitcher, S. R
Right arrow Articles by Gomes, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deitcher, S. R
Right arrow Articles by Gomes, M. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Vascular Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 1, 33-46 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/1358863x03vm461ra
© 2003 SAGE Publications

Hypercoagulable state testing and malignancy screening following venous thromboembolic events

Steven R Deitcher

Departments of Hematology and Medical Oncology and Cardiovascular Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA, deitchs{at}ccf.org

Marcelo PV Gomes

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

Mounting interest in hypercoagulability, increased availability of hypercoagulable state test ‘panels’ and enhanced ability to identify abnormalities in tested patients have prompted widespread testing. Testing for acquired and inherited hypercoagulable states uncovers an abnormality in over 50% of patients presenting with an initial venous thromboembolic event (VTE) but may have minimal actual impact on management in most of these patients. Such laboratory screening should be reserved for patients in whom the results of individual tests will signifi cantly impact the choice of anticoagulant agent, intensity of anticoagulant therapy, therapeutic monitoring, family screening, family planning, prognosis determination, and most of all duration of therapy. Testing ‘just to know’ is neither cost-effective nor clinically appropriate. The most important testing in patients following acute VTE may be ageand gender-specifi c cancer screening. Cancer screening following VTE seems most prudent in older individuals and in those with idiopathic VTE and no laboratory evidence for an inherited hypercoagulable state. Cancer screening should focus on identifi cation of treatable cancers and those where diagnosis in an early stage favorably impacts patient survival. Extensive searches for occult malignancy employing whole-body computed tomography and serum tumor markers may identify more cancers but without affecting patient outcome. We advocate that physicians should focus their attention more on VTE prophylaxis and proper treatment and less on costly and, at times, invasive testing of questionable value.

Key Words: cancer • diagnosis • hypercoagulable states • laboratory testing • screening • venous thrombosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?