Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Vascular Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hackam, D.
Right arrow Articles by Anand, S. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hackam, D.
Right arrow Articles by Anand, S. S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Vascular viewpoint

Daniel Hackam

Sonia S Anand

anands{at}mcmaster.ca

Question: Does oral acetylcysteine prevent acute contrast nephropathy in patients with moderate renal impairment who undergo elective coronary angiography?

Population: Patients with moderate stable renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance,60 ml/min or serum creatinine .1.2 mg/dl [106 mmol/l]) who were scheduled to undergo elective coronary angiography with or without intervention.

Design and methods: Randomized placebo-controlled trial. A total of 200 patients were randomized to either oral acetylcysteine 600 mg BID (n = 102) or matching placebo (n = 98). Treatment was given for a total of four doses, starting the day before angiography and continuing on the day of the procedure. All patients received intravenous normal saline for 12 hours before and 6 hours after contrast exposure, and low osmolality contrast agents. Primary outcome was the occurrence of more than a 25% increase in serum creatinine level within 48 hours after contrast exposure. Coprimary outcomes were a change in creatinine clearance and serum creatinine level. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events, need for dialysis, and length of hospitalization. Patients, caregivers, and outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.

Results: Within 48 hours after contrast administration 12/98 (12%) control patients and 4/102 (4%) acetylcysteine patients developed a more than 25% increase in serum creatinine level. Relative risk = 0.32 (95% CI: 0.10--0.96; p = 0.03). Serum creatinine was lower in the acetylcysteine group than in the control group during the first 48 hours after angiography (1.22 mg/dl [108 mmol/l] vs 1.38 mg/dl [122.9 mmol/l]; p = 0.006), but this difference was no longer significant at seven days. Creatinine clearance increased significantly more in the acetylcysteine group than in the placebo group at day two [+30% vs +5%; p < 0.001] and at day seven [+23% vs +15%; p = 0.045]. The average length of stay was half a day shorter in the group receiving acetylcysteine(p = 0.02). No patients in either group required dialysis. There were no treatment-related adverse events.

Conclusions: Acetylcysteine safely and effectively reduces the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with moderate renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography.

Vascular Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 4, 337-338 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/1358863x02vm459xx


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?