Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krupski, W. C
Right arrow Articles by Hiatt, W. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krupski, W. C
Right arrow Articles by Hiatt, W. R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Negative impact of cardiac evaluation before vascular surgery

William C Krupski

The Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Colorado, USA, The Denver Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA

Mark R Nehler

The Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Colorado, USA, The Denver Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA

Thomas A Whitehill

The Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Colorado, USA, The Denver Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA

Robert C Lawson

The Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Colorado, USA, The Denver Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA

Pamela K Strecker

The Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Colorado, USA, The Denver Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA

William R Hiatt

The Section of Vascular Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Colorado, USA

The optimal preoperative evaluation of cardiac risk in patients with peripheral vascular disease is controversial. In developing a paradigm for preoperative cardiac workup, potential adverse effects of evaluation and cardiac intervention must be considered. This study analyzed the deleterious outcomes of extensive, comprehensive cardiac evaluation and intervention before planned vascular surgery in patients treated at the Denver Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Over a 12-month period between 1994 and 1995, 161 patients were scheduled to undergo major vascular operations; 153 patients came to operation. The decision to pursue a cardiac evaluation was variously made by a combination of surgeons, cardiologists, and anesthesiologists. No defined protocol was followed. Cardiac history, chest X-rays and ECGs were obtained for all patients. Extendedcardiac evaluation included these studies plus special tests, including echocardiography (echo), radionuclide ventriculography (RNVG), dipyridamole thallium scintigraphy (DTS), and cardiac catheterization (CC). Extended cardiac evaluations were undertaken in 42 patients. Complications related to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were also recorded. Cardiac mortality and morbidity after vascular interventions were itemized in all 153 patients.

Forty-two male patients, aged 68 6 9 years, underwent extended cardiac evaluations before planned vascular operations. The median elapsed time for cardiac workup was 14 days (mean 30 6 59 days). The median and mean times from cardiac workup to vascular surgery were 25 days and 76 6 142 days, respectively. Eighteen (43%) patients had echo or RNVG; 22 (52%) patients had DTS; 27 (64%) had CC; 9 (21%) had PTCA; 7 (17%) had CABG. Sixteen (38%) patients had untoward events related to cardiac evaluation. Eight patients (19%: one with cerebrovascular disease, and seven with aortic aneurysms) refused vascular surgery after extended cardiac workup. Complications attributable to CC, PTCA, and CABG included prosthetic graft infection, pseudoaneurysms (two), sternal wound infections (two), renal failure and brain anoxia. Two patients with severe limb ischemia who were candidates for revascularization ultimately required amputations because of delay due to cardiac evaluations.

Extensive cardiac evaluation prior to vascular operations can result in morbidity, delays, and refusal to undergo vascular surgery. The underlying indication for vascular operations and the local iatrogenic cardiac complication rates must be considered before ordering special studies.

Key Words: cardiac • evaluation • morbidity • outcomes • vascular

Vascular Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 1, 3-9 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1358836X0000500102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
C. H. Selzman, S. A. Miller, M. A. Zimmerman, and A. H. Harken
The Case for {beta}-Adrenergic Blockade as Prophylaxis Against Perioperative Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality
Arch Surg, March 1, 2001; 136(3): 286 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
J. F. Foss
Preoperative Evaluation of the Patient for Vascular Surgery in the "Real World"
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, November 1, 2000; 4(4): 213 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
K. E Raby
Is preoperative cardiac testing necessary among vascular surgery patients?
Vascular Medicine, February 1, 2000; 5(1): 1 - 2.
[PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
W. C. Krupski
Expert Commentary
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 2000; 12(2): 43 - 48.
[PDF]