Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Vascular Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palfreyman, S. J
Right arrow Articles by Michaels, J. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palfreyman, S. J
Right arrow Articles by Michaels, J. A
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A systematic review of compression therapy for venous leg ulcers

Simon J Palfreyman

Sheffield Vascular Institute, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK

Rona Lochiel

Sheffield Vascular Institute, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK

Jonathan A Michaels

Sheffield Vascular Institute, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK

The aim of the study was to determine the relative effectiveness of compression therapies used in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were sought using a search strategy that aimed to identify relevant RCT by searching eight electronic databases (including Medline, Embase and CINHAL), conference proceedings and hand searching key journals. In addition, citations within papers were scrutinized to identify any relevant studies. Suitability for inclusion in this review was determined by a critical appraisal of key determinants of the quality of the trials. Trials that included patients of mixed ulcer aetiology were excluded unless the results of patients with venous disease were reported separately. Data was extracted independently by two reviewers and synthesized quantitatively and qualitatively. Losses to follow-up/withdrawals were assumed to be failures of treatment.

A total of 132 articles were identified, and of these eight fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The remaining 126 trials were excluded due to trial design flaws, the inclusion of mixed/arterial aetiology ulcers or because they were non-RCT. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model showed the benefits of multi-layer and elastic compression bandages. It was concluded that more high-quality trials are required and that more emphasis should be placed on economic and quality of life data to try to ascertain the cost-effectiveness and utility of the treatment options available.

Key Words: bandages • meta-analysis • randomized controlled trials • venous leg ulcer

Vascular Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 4, 301-313 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/1358836X9800300406
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
S. Palfreyman, E A. Nelson, and J. A Michaels
Dressings for venous leg ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ, August 4, 2007; 335(7613): 244 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DTBHome page
Compression therapy for venous leg ulcers
DTB, April 1, 2000; 38(4): 28 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]