This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mohammed, N. Articles by Anand, S. S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mohammed, N. Articles by Anand, S. S Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Vascular viewpoint

McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Sonia S Anand

McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, anands{at}mcmaster.ca

Question: Is carotid endarterectomy (CEA) an effective and safe treatment for the prevention of stroke among patients with >60% internal carotid artery stenosis who had no neurologic symptoms in the previous 6 months.

Population: Men and women with severe (>60%) unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis not associated with neurologic symptoms in the past 6 months, where both doctor and patient were uncertain whether to choose or to defer immediate CEA. Design and methods: During 1993-2003, 3120 asymptomatic patients with >60% carotid stenosis were randomized equally to immediate CEAversus indefinite deferral of CEA, and were followed for up to 5 years. The primary end point was risk of stroke or death at 5 years. Analysis was by intention to treat. The treatment of patients with antiplatelet agents, antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapies was left to the discretion of the clinician.

Results: Among patients randomized to immediate CEA (50% had CEA by 1 month, 88% by 1 year) versus deferred, the incidence of stroke or death at 5 years was 6.4% versus 11.8% (95% CI: 3.0-7.7, p < 0.0001); 3.5% versus 6.1% for fatal or disabling strokes (95% CI: 0.8-4.3, p = 0.004), and 2.1% versus 4.2% for fatal strokes (95% CI: 0.6-3.6, p = 0.006). The perioperative stroke incidence was marginally higher in the delayed group versus the immediate group (4.5% versus 2.8%) and overall the risk per CEA of perioperative stroke or death was 3.1%. After excluding the perioperative events from the analysis, the 5-year stroke risks were 3.8% versus 11% (95% CI: 5.0-9.4], p < 0.0001). Surgery primarily prevented carotid territory ischemic strokes (2.7% vs 9.5%; gain 6.8% [4.8-8.8], p < 0.0001). The impact of immediate surgery was consistent in all age groups, among men and women, and across the spectrum of carotid stenosis (i.e. 70%, 80% and 90% carotid stenosis).

Conclusion: In asymptomatic patients younger than 75 years of age with carotid stenosis of 70% or more on ultrasound, immediate CEA reduces the 5-year incidence of stroke and death.

Vascular Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 1, 77-78 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/1358863x05vm588xx


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?